Preview image. Unlock full-res
Problem slide pairing a white bullet card with a two-bar comparison chart showing that only 2% of US electric demand can buy clean power directly.
Summary
The second problem slide: a white bullet card explains that buying clean power directly is hard, and a two-bar comparison chart on the right zooms from the 2% who can buy to the fact that big tech dominates even that sliver.
Visual description
Same grammar as the prior slide: off-white background, a monospace "Problem" label under a short yellow rule top-left, and a tall white rounded card with drop shadow on the left. The card holds a bold sans "What?" headline and three monospace bullets: "Directly buying clean power is hard", "Only 2% of US electric demand has access to direct purchases of clean power", and "Of that 2%, more than half are 4 big tech companies". The right half is a two-bar chart. A top horizontal bar is mostly slate gray labeled "98% of US electric demand can't buy clean power", capped by a thin yellow sliver labeled "2% can". Dashed gray connector lines fan down from that yellow sliver to a second bar below, which splits into a gray segment ("45% other industries") and a yellow segment ("55% 4 big tech companies"). All labels are monospace.
Key takeaway
The zoom-in comparison: a tiny highlighted slice in one bar expands via dashed connectors into a full second bar, a clean way to show "and within that small group, here is the real story". Reusing the single yellow accent for the meaningful segment keeps the chart legible and on-brand.
Reuse notes
A reusable pattern for market-sizing, funnel, or share-of-market slides where you need to drill from a whole into a subset. The dashed-connector zoom reads instantly and works on any two-bar pair. Keep to two bars and a single accent color; adding more series would break the calm, low-ink style. Pairs directly with the matching stat-ring problem slide as a two-part problem section.
