How the breach was identified bar charts

Summary

A figure slide stacking two horizontal bar charts (Figure 12 on share, Figure 13 on cost) by how the breach was identified, with two columns of body copy to the left.

Visual description

White slide with standard chrome. The left half carries two text columns, each opening with a bold figure lead-in ("Figure 12. Breaches were most commonly identified by a benign third party." and "Figure 13. Data breaches disclosed by the attacker, such as with ransomware, cost significantly more.") that flow into regular body. The right half stacks two charts separated by a faint hairline. The top chart, "How was the breach identified?", is three blue horizontal bars (By a benign third party 40%, By the organization's security teams and tools 33%, By disclosure from the attacker 27%) over a 0 to 45% axis. The bottom chart, "Cost of a data breach by how the breach was identified," repeats the three categories as longer blue bars with dollar values ($4.68, $4.30, $5.23) over a $0 to $6 axis. Each has a small italic figure caption.

Key takeaway

Stacking two charts that share the same three row categories so the reader compares "how often" against "how costly" on the same vertical rhythm. Holding both to one blue keeps the comparison about length, not color.

Reuse notes

A tidy pattern when two metrics describe the same set of categories and you want them read together. The shared category order top-to-bottom is what makes the pairing work; keep it identical across both charts. Suits dense report pages where vertical stacking is more efficient than side-by-side.