Preview image. Unlock full-res
Two text columns on the left against a boxed right panel stacking two horizontal bar charts on type of data compromised and per-record cost by data type.
Summary
A data-type slide: two columns of commentary on the left, two stacked horizontal bar charts on the right covering frequency and per-record cost by type of data compromised.
Visual description
White background, running header ("02" left, "Complete findings" centered). The left half holds a bold "Figures 9a and 9b..." lead-in and two columns of body text on customer PII being the most common and costliest record type. The right half is a pale gray panel with two stacked horizontal bar charts: "Type of data compromised" (five data types, each with three year-bars for 2023/2022/2021 and percent labels, 0 to 60% axis) above "Per-record cost of a data breach by type of record compromised" (five data types as single blue bars with USD labels, $0 to $200 axis), each with its own legend and "Figure 9a / 9b" caption. A footer carries section navigation.
Key takeaway
Stacking two related horizontal bar charts in one panel so a "how often" chart sits directly above a "how costly" chart for the same categories, letting the reader compare frequency against cost down the same row order.
Reuse notes
Reusable when two metrics describe the same category set and belong side by side; aligning the category order between the two charts is what makes the comparison work. Keeps the deck's tinted-panel chart convention. Best with five to seven categories so both charts fit.
From this deck: Type and per-record cost of data compromised
View deck
