Preview image. Unlock full-res
White figure slide with two body columns and two stacked bar charts on automated response playbooks and whether the ransom was paid.
Summary
Figures 24 and 25 slide: two stacked horizontal bar charts, one on the containment-time impact of automated response playbooks, one comparing ransomware cost by whether the ransom was paid across 2023 and 2022, with two body columns to the left.
Visual description
White slide with standard chrome. The left half holds two body columns each opening with a bold figure lead-in ("Figure 24. Automated response playbooks or workflows cut down the time to contain a ransomware breach." and "Figure 25. Paying the ransom led to minimal cost savings."). The right half stacks two charts split by a hairline. The top, "Impact of automated response playbooks or workflows for ransomware on time to contain a ransomware breach," is two dark navy bars (Didn't have 80, Had 68) over a 0 to 90 day axis with an MTTC legend. The bottom, "Cost of a ransomware attack based on whether the ransom was paid," shows two categories (Didn't pay ransom, Paid ransom) each with a blue 2023 bar and a purple 2022 bar and dollar labels ($5.17/$5.12 and $5.06/$4.49) over a $0 to $6 axis, with a 2023/2022 legend.
Key takeaway
A year-over-year grouped bar (two years per category, distinct colors) layered into the same stacked-charts module the deck uses everywhere, so a time comparison drops into the existing system without a new layout. Day-based and dollar-based charts coexist on one page by sharing column structure.
Reuse notes
Reach for the paired-year bars when you want to show this-year-versus-last alongside a categorical split. Keep the year colors fixed across the deck if you repeat the device. The two charts here measure different units (days vs dollars); the shared vertical rhythm is what keeps them feeling like one exhibit.
From this deck: Automated playbooks and ransom paid charts
View deck
