
Preview image. Unlock full-res
Report slide with a left topic+caption column and a gray panel holding a two-row horizontal stacked bar chart of breach time by MSSP use.
Summary
A data slide on managed security service providers: a left topic heading and body, a bold figure-caption middle column, and a pale-gray panel on the right with a two-row horizontal stacked bar chart comparing breach time with and without an MSSP.
Visual description
White background with the blue "02" number and "Complete findings" header at top. The far-left column carries a two-line "Managed security service providers" heading over body copy. A middle column holds a bold lede ("Figure 48. Organizations with MSSPs experienced a 21% shorter breach lifecycle.") and a long justified body block. The right two-thirds is a pale-gray rounded panel titled "Time to identify and contain a data breach when using an MSSP." Two labeled rows ("No MSSP" and "Using MSSP") each show a two-segment horizontal bar: a violet MTTI segment and a navy MTTC segment, value inside each, bold total to the right (310 vs 251). A 0 to 300 axis and an MTTI/MTTC swatch legend sit below. A "Figure 48. Measured in days" caption and a navigation footer follow.
Key takeaway
The deck's recurring figure template applied verbatim, which is the point: by slide 61 the reader already knows how to read violet-plus-navy bars with a bold total, so a new metric needs zero relearning. Consistency is the design move.
Reuse notes
Use this as the canonical instance of the deck's two-row comparison chart. It demonstrates how a fixed chart grammar repeated across many findings makes a long report navigable. Pair every such chart with a bold-lede caption stating the takeaway, and keep the panel, axis, and color coding identical slide to slide.
From this deck: Managed security service providers stacked bar chart
View deck





















































































