
Preview image. Unlock full-res
A dense figure slide with a two-column explainer and two side-by-side column charts on the right showing AI usage levels and breach cost by usage level.
Summary
A two-chart figure slide: a two-column running-text explainer on the left, and on the right two side-by-side grey panels, one a three-column chart of AI usage levels, the other a three-column chart of breach cost by usage level.
Visual description
White slide, "02 / Complete findings" header. The left two-thirds is body copy in two narrow columns opened by bold "Figure 40" and "Figure 41" lead-ins. The right third holds two adjacent pale grey panels. The left panel, "State of security AI and automation comparing three usage levels," is a vertical bar chart with three blue columns (28%, 33%, 39%) for extensive, limited and no use on a percentage axis. The right panel, "Cost of a data breach by security AI and automation usage level," repeats the three categories as dollar columns ($3.60, $4.04, $5.36). Figure captions sit beneath each panel.
Key takeaway
Two small three-bar charts placed side by side that share the same three categories, so adoption and its cost consequence read together across one glance. Keeping each chart in its own grey panel within the right column maintains the figure grammar even at small size.
Reuse notes
A compact way to show "how common" and "what it costs" for the same few categories. Three bars per chart stays readable when panels are narrow. Reuse for any tiered comparison (low/medium/high) measured on two metrics. Matches the deck's panel-and-blue conventions.
From this deck: Security AI usage levels and cost figures
View deck





















































































