Preview image. Unlock full-res
Report slide with a figure-caption column beside two gray chart panels, a donut split (36/64%) and a two-bar cost comparison.
Summary
A two-chart data slide: a bold figure-caption block on the left, then two pale-gray panels side by side, a donut chart splitting CVE-only vs risk-based prioritization (36% / 64%) and a two-column bar chart comparing their breach costs ($4.78 vs $3.98M).
Visual description
White background with the blue "02" number and "Complete findings" header on top. The left-center column carries a bold lede ("Figures 45 and 46. Organizations that prioritize activities beyond CVE score experienced less costly breaches.") and justified body copy. To its right sit two equal pale-gray rounded panels. The left panel, titled "How does your organization manage vulnerability prioritization?", holds a donut chart with a navy 36% wedge and a violet 64% wedge, labels inside the ring and a two-row swatch legend below. The right panel, titled "Cost of a data breach by vulnerability-management prioritization approach", holds two vertical bars, a taller navy "$4.78" (CVE score only) and a shorter violet "$3.98" (other risk-based analysis), against a $0 to $5.00 axis. Figure captions sit beneath each panel; a navigation footer runs along the bottom.
Key takeaway
Placing a composition chart (donut: who does what) next to an outcome chart (bars: what it costs) so the slide tells a cause-and-effect story in one read. Matching the donut wedge colors to the bar colors links the two panels without a word of explanation.
Reuse notes
A reusable layout for any "share of population, then consequence" finding. Keep the two panels identical in size and the color mapping consistent across them. The bold-lede caption beside the charts is the deck's standard data grammar; reuse it for every figure slide so the deck stays uniform.
From this deck: CVE vs risk-based donut and bar chart pair
View deck
