
Preview image. Unlock full-res
Report slide with a left topic+caption column and a gray panel holding a two-row horizontal stacked bar chart of breach time by ASM use.
Summary
A data slide on attack surface management: a left topic heading and body, a bold figure-caption middle column, and a pale-gray panel on the right with a two-row horizontal stacked bar chart comparing breach time with and without an ASM solution.
Visual description
White background with the blue "02" number and "Complete findings" header at top. The far-left column carries an "Attack surface management" heading over body copy. A middle column holds a bold lede ("Figure 47. ASM helped accelerate total time to identify and contain a data breach by nearly 12 weeks.") and justified body copy. The right two-thirds is a pale-gray rounded panel titled "Time to identify and contain a data breach by use of an ASM solution." Two labeled rows ("Doesn't have ASM solution" and "Has ASM solution") each show a two-segment horizontal bar: a violet MTTI segment and a navy MTTC segment, value inside each segment, bold total to the right (337 vs 254). A 0 to 350 axis and an MTTI/MTTC swatch legend sit below. A "Figure 47. Measured in days" caption and a navigation footer follow.
Key takeaway
The three-column read: topic heading, written interpretation, then the proof panel. Same two-segment stacked-bar convention as the deck's other figure slides, here with just two rows so the contrast is blunt and immediate.
Reuse notes
A tidy default for a single before/after comparison that still needs surrounding explanation. Two rows is the minimum that keeps the chart honest; the gray panel quarantines the data from the prose. Stay within the deck's restrained palette and reuse the MTTI/MTTC color coding everywhere it appears.
From this deck: Attack surface management stacked bar chart
View deck





















































































