Threat intelligence MTTI comparison line chart

Summary

A comparison slide: a bold figure-caption block on the left and, on the right, two labeled groups of stacked horizontal lines whose differing lengths visualize 188 versus 216 days to identify a breach.

Visual description

White background with the blue "02" number and "Complete findings" running header at top. The left-center column carries a bold lede ("Figure 44. Threat intelligence reduced breach identification time.") and justified body copy. The right side is titled "Time to identify a data breach using threat intelligence" with a "Figure 44. MTTI measured in days" subcaption. Two stat labels anchor the comparison: a large "188 / Uses threat intelligence" and a higher "216 / Doesn't use threat intelligence." Below each, a dense stack of thin horizontal lines runs left to right, color-graded top-to-bottom from violet through blue to cyan; the "uses" group's lines stop short while the "doesn't use" group's lines extend further right, encoding the day difference as line length. The chart bleeds off the bottom edge.

Key takeaway

Encoding a two-number comparison as two banks of gradient lines of differing length, rather than plain bars. It reads as a data visualization and as the deck's signature line motif at once, so the chart and the brand graphic are the same object.

Reuse notes

Good for any report comparing two quantities where you want the chart to feel designed rather than default. The big paired numbers do the fast communication; the line banks add texture and brand. Keep it on a light field and limit to two or three groups so the line lengths stay comparable at a glance.