Preview image. Unlock full-res
White "Peak Trust Crisis" spread led by an oversized statement that 34% of 18-24s trust tech but only 17% trust social media, with supporting columns and a photo.
Summary
A white findings spread led by an oversized condensed statement that 34% of 18-24-year-olds trust technology but only 17% trust social media, supported by columns of cited copy and a candid photo.
Visual description
White background, 16:9. A grey-outlined pill title reads "PEAK TRUST CRISIS" at top center with "CRISIS" italicized; header "INTRODUCTION 3. THE ERA OF INSTABILITY" and page "31" frame it. A large condensed black statement dominates the upper right ("34% of 18-24 year olds see technology as trustworthy (more than any other industry), but the picture is very different when it comes to social media, with only 17% saying they trust it.") with the percentages emphasized in line. The left column and lower columns carry small body copy under bold all-caps subheads ("TRUST CRISIS AND MISINFORMATION", "BILLIONAIRE BACKLASH AND THE END OF INFLUENCERS", "NEW FOUND FAITH") with citations. A color photo at lower right shows a young person leaping onto a bed while looking at a phone. An "impermaculture" tab sits bottom-right.
Key takeaway
Leading with the statistic as a full sentence in oversized condensed type, with the two numbers emphasized inline, so the contrast (trust tech, distrust social) is the headline. The body columns then justify it without burying the hook.
Reuse notes
The pattern for a single striking comparative stat: write it as a readable sentence at display size rather than as a number-plus-label. Reuse for any "X% but only Y%" finding. Supporting columns keep it defensible; the incidental photo adds life.
From this deck: Peak Trust Crisis - big stat statement with body columns
View deck
