Preview image. Unlock full-res
Appendix grouped horizontal bar chart comparing how newcomers and established practitioners distribute across seven expertise profiles in green and blue.
Summary
An appendix data slide: a grouped horizontal bar chart comparing how Newcomers (n = 56) and Established (n = 60) respondents split across seven expertise profiles, with paired green and blue bars per profile.
Visual description
Pale warm-cream background, "APPENDIX" header and page number "64" on a hairline rule. A two-line salmon title ("Expertise profiles / Newcomers vs. Established") sits centered above the plot. Seven right-aligned profile labels run down the left (Specialist, Adaptive Learner, Generalist, Deep Generalist, Polymath, T-Shaped, Connector). Each profile shows two stacked-adjacent horizontal bars: a light-green Newcomers bar above a light-blue Established bar, each with an inline percentage. Contrasts pop visually, Polymath skews newcomer (20% vs 10%), Generalist skews established (16% vs 32%), on a 0 to 40% gridline scale. A small two-row legend sits lower-right; a grey Q12 footnote (n = 116) explains the question.
Key takeaway
Pairing the two cohort bars directly under each label so each comparison is a self-contained mini-pair, easy to scan for "which group leans which way." Reusing the same green=Newcomers / blue=Established coding seen on the radar slide (55) gives the whole appendix a consistent two-cohort color language.
Reuse notes
The cleanest of the two-cohort comparisons in this deck and the most directly reusable: grouped horizontal bars are the safe default when you have one categorical axis and two series to compare. Keep the cohort colors consistent with any other two-group slides in the same deck so readers do not relearn the legend. Inline labels are essential at this bar density.
From this deck: Expertise profiles newcomers vs established bars
View deck
