Cultural Research deep dive twin donut charts

Appendix deep-dive slide pairing two donut charts for cultural research and futures practitioners, matching the twin-donut template.

Styleeditorial, minimal, light-mode, data-dense

Colorlight, warm, muted, cool

Typeserif, sans-serif

Moodprofessional, calm, technical

Elementschart, diagram

Tagsappendix, donut-chart, twin-donuts, ring-chart, two-up, center-label, leader-lines, salmon-and-blue, page-number, hairline-rule, survey-data

Palette

#FBEFEC

#F5A98A

#7FD0F2

#D98A6B

Summary

An appendix deep-dive slide on Cultural Research & Futures practitioners (n = 31), using the same two-donut layout as the surrounding deep-dive pages: "Prior fields of expertise" on the left, "Related Specialisations" on the right.

Visual description

Pale warm-cream background, "APPENDIX" header and page number "59" on a hairline rule. Dark-grey title upper-left ("Deep Dive: Cultural Research & Futures (n = 31)"). Two equal donut charts sit side by side. The left ring, center-labeled "Prior fields of expertise" in salmon, breaks down prior careers (No prior experience 11%, Brand Strategy 11%, Cultural Research & Strategy 11%, Business Strategy 9%, Innovation & Design Thinking 7%, down to Fashion & Design 5%, plus "Other 35%"), alternating salmon and light-blue wedges with leader-line labels and percentages. The right ring, "Related Specialisations," charts adjacent specialties (Trend Research or Forecasting 21%, Foresight-Driven Innovation 17%, Futures Education 15%, Participatory Foresight 9%, etc.). Grey "Reading Example" footnotes under each donut explain how to read a single slice.

Key takeaway

The consistency move: this page is visually identical to the trend-research deep dive, so the reader parses it instantly. Repeating one exact chart template across a series of profiles is what makes a long appendix navigable.

Reuse notes

One in a series of deep-dive donut pages (slides 58 to 60). Reuse it when you have several sub-populations to profile the same way; the value is in the rigid repetition, not novelty per page. As with all of these, keep the inline percentages and leader lines or the thin slices become unreadable.